|
The
exuberant media
Business journalism has always shaken
and stirred stock markets
N Chandra
Mohan
 |
|
N Chandra Mohan
|
The spotlight is again on the role of the
business press. The Indian Express frontpaged a story that
the leading pink dailies indulged in “breathless buy-buy prose”
in pitching for investments in the now discredited Cyberspace
Infosys. In another instance, an anti-Unit Trust of India
campaign was believed to have been launched by a leading investment
magazine which urged its readers to get rid of their US-64
units ASAP.
The natural inclination of most readers to such news is to
bash the business press for its questionable ethics. Business
journalists are believed to write to an hidden agenda; and
quite often, are vehicles for planted or highly motivated
stories. A more common perception is that their stories often
set the stage for market moves. And that the more influential
writers among them indeed are major players.
The demand for a code of conduct arises in this context. Many
people wonder whether business journalists should at all recommend
particular investments in the stock markets or give specific
advice on how readers should manage their investment portfolios.
When the action at the bourses is more akin to a casino or
race course, should the press at all indulge in punting? Is
the Indian experience any different from the rest of the world?
The main difficulty with such thinking is that there are no
shining examples anywhere else. The US, for instance, is a
country where the tradition of business journalism is more
mature or advanced than in India. But Mr Howard Kurtz, author
of The Fortune Tellers:Inside Wall Street’s Game of Money,
Media and Manipulation, feels differently and considers financial
journalists to be movers and shakers on Wall Street.
According to him, they make things happen instantaneously,
and their impact is gauged not by subjective polls but by
the starker standard of stock prices. In other words, like
in India they too indulge in “breathless buy-buy prose” or
sell-sell advice, moving the markets in a big way. The charge
of insider trading has stuck to some of them; some US financial
journalists are also being sued for their wrong investment
advice!
All of this does not whitewash what the pink dailies have
done to Cyberspace Infosys. Just because it happens in the
US, it does not justify the doings of their counterparts in
India. The point actually is a more disturbing one which the
code of conduct types do not consider — notably, that it is
impossible to separate the role of the business press altogether
from speculative manias, crashes and panics in stock markets.
The fact is that the business press is an integral element
of speculative bubbles around the world. That they not only
set the stage but also instigate the market moves themselves.
That this has been going on since the advent of newspapers.
That the business press in fact are “fundamental propagators
of speculative price movements” —- all of this has been rigorously
argued by Professor Robert Shiller in Irrational Exuberance.
The reasons behind this phenomenon are not necessarily perfidious.
They relate to the compulsion to make news interesting on
a daily basis. When there is so much competition for readership,
a good lead story on stock market movements is bound to rivet
attention. “Nothing beats the stock markets for the sheer
frequency of potentially interesting news items”, felt Prof
Shiller, as this brought in the “most loyal repeat customers”.
Back to India, the rapid spread of the equity culture since
the 1990s underpinned a boom in business dailies. Most general
newspapers beefed up their business sections, an integral
element of which has been the stock pages and regular columns
by investment analysts. The more specialised pink dailies
of course had a more extensive coverage of investor-related
material which appeared in the beginning of the week.
Satisfying the hunger for stock market stories is indeed the
basis on which most publications planned their business coverage.
No business journalist is pulled up for missing a corporate
story but the phones start burning if the stock quotes are
wrong or the previous days quotes have been carried by mistake!
No amount of apologies are sufficient as it’s possible that
losses have been incurred with such a goof up.
Serious business journalism cannot therefore altogether ignore
this seemingly insatiable hunger for stock market-related
information and stories. Where does one put one’s money? Which
stocks are the hot ones to pick up? Rare is the journalist
who does not have to confront such questions from even ordinary
people. The widespread impression is that the journalist is
an expert who is privy to inside market gossip or tips!
Despite their superficial skill-base, quite a few business
journalists do dabble in playing the stock market guru, dispensing
their two bits of wisdom on which stocks to pick and choose
from. That is a dangerous game to play as the Cyberspace Infosys
episode illustrates. The defence of such action that the subsequent
denouement could not have been foreseen is a weak one. The
question still remains whether one should be doing such things
at all.
Instead of refraining from making any recommendations perhaps
a better course of action is to lay out the pros and cons
of particular stocks or funds, leaving it to the reader to
decide what to do. This could entail a rigorous rating of
issues on a scale for their safety, prospective returns, risk
factors and other relevant parameters — as is being done in
the country’s first and possibly best business magazine.
The perfidious element can be reduced if business journalists
reported their portfolio (if any) to the immediate boss and
refrained from writing on such issues or concerned companies.
This would minimise conflicts of interest and considerably
enhance the credibility of the publication. But no matter
how foolproof such a system is, the scope for abuse undoubtedly
exists in a big way. But the link between business journalism
and stock market moves is a reality that cannot be wished
away.
|