|
Mounting NPAs lead to 54 per cent rise in write-offs in fiscal
2001
Our
Markets Bureau
In an effort to clean up their balance sheets, most public
sector banks (PSBs) have increased the amount of write-offs
during the fiscal 2001. Out of the 27 PSBs, 19 including State
Bank of India (SBI) and five of its associates, have increased
the amount of write-off by Rs 1,980.73 crore during the period.
According to finance ministry figures, the write-off of these
19 banks was Rs 4,387.62 crore in 2000-01 compared with Rs
2,406.87 crore in the previous fiscal.
However, eight PSBs have reduced this amount by Rs 222.91
crore, from Rs 836.61 crore to Rs 613.7 crore.
The higher write-offs were required as there was a continuous
deterioration in these banks’ asset quality. The 27 PSBs’
gross non-performing assets (NPAs) have increased by Rs 1,479
crore during the year ended March 31, 2001. The amount of
bad debts written off by the 27 public sector banks has increased
by an average 54 per cent in the year ended March 2001 as
their cumulative NPAs touched a high of Rs 54,773 crore during
the year.
However, there has been decline in the NPAs of PSBs as a percentage
of gross advances from 14 per cent in fiscal 2000 to 12.4
per cent in fiscal 2001.
Thanks to the huge NPAs and their voluntary retirement scheme
(VRS), the bottomlines of these banks have come under pressure.
The PSBs had to shell out Rs 3,062.6 crore on account of VRS
during the year. The 13 PSBs have reported a fall in net profits
in 2000-01.
The net profit of all the PSBs has decreased by Rs 799.21
crore, from Rs 5,116.18 crore to Rs 4,316.97 crore.
These banks will continue to feel the pressure on their bottomlines
as the VRS cost of Rs 7,200.34 crore would be spread over
the next four years. The PSBs, except for SBI and Corporation
Bank, have been poorly discounted on the stock markets for
the past couple of years.
Some of them have plans to tap the primary market, but have
been deferring their issues for fear of poor investor response.
The PSBs have also been hit by narrowing spreads, poor credit
offtake and slackening economic growth. These banks are also
feeling the heat of competition from their private sector
peers as the latter are aggressive on the fee-based activity
front.
|