| EDITORIAL |
| |
|
Food
for thought
Grain banks
are worth considering
The problem of storing foodgrains cries out for a solution and
by all available indications people in government do not seem any
closer to finding one. The centre’s suggestion that the states do
their own procurement and distribution has drawn a blank. The states
say they do not have the money to get into this. Even if they were
to agree to do so, it is at best half a solution. Decentralisation
would make the problem appear smaller, but certainly not do away
with it. Storing foodgrain efficiently at the state level will be
as much of a headache and would not, in all probability, serve the
larger social purpose of getting it to the needy. It is in this
context that an idea put forward by the eminent agricultural scientist,
MS Swaminathan, deserves serious consideration. He has proposed
that centralised methods of collection and distribution be replaced
with a grain bank movement at the village level. If such an effort
were to be undertaken seriously, Swaminathan believes, 25,000 grain
banks could be created. The grain banks could have a capacity of
250 tonnes. They could procure grain locally or draw on rural godown
scheme.
The advantages would be two-fold. First, low-cost technologies could
be used to make this an affordable effort and because the quantities
involved would be small they would be manageable in more ways than
one. Secondly, grain banks will serve the purpose of targeting the
needy. Tribal and drought-prone villages that are difficult to reach
would benefit hugely. With the government’s dismal record before
us, it is not out of order to consider reducing its role in food
management. Recent evidence suggests that village-level efforts
at managing fuel, fodder and water have been successful beyond all
expectations. This is primarily because the government has been
doing such a lousy job that anything else just has to be better.
But another reason is that many problems —- and foodgrain collection
and storage are among them —- have become so acute that solutions
to them have to be found in innovative models of self-governance.
The government has to learn when to step aside and as it sits on
millions of tonnes of foodgrain, often allowing it to rot, it is
long over due that the government took a hard and close look at
its role in food management.
|
| |
|
|
| |