1. Salman Khan case: Witness says life under threat, Rajasthan govt steps in

Salman Khan case: Witness says life under threat, Rajasthan govt steps in

A day after a missing witness surprisingly surfaced in the Slaman Khan poaching case and said he was facing threats to his life, Rajasthan Home Minister Gulab Chand Kataria has said the state police would provide protection – the man surfaced barely hours after the court acquitted Salman from the black buck and chinkara killing cases.

By: | Published: July 28, 2016 4:34 PM

A day after a missing witness surprisingly surfaced in the Slaman Khan poaching case and said he was facing threats to his life, Rajasthan Home Minister Gulab Chand Kataria has said the state police would provide protection – the man surfaced barely hours after the court acquitted Salman from the black buck and chinkara killing cases.

The witness, Harish Dulani was reported to be “missing” since 2002, which weakened the prosecution’s case against Khan, and had surfaced two days after the actor was acquitted. He stuck to his claim that the actor had shot the animal dead.

Dulani, who was driving the jeep used by Khan during the alleged Chinkara hunt in Jodhpur in 1998, had maintained that he had not come forward earlier due to threats to his life.

“He never approached us and did not bring this issue to notice. If he gives anything in writing, arrangement for his protection would be made. If he does not come, he will be contacted by the local police,” Kataria said.

The Rajasthan High Court in its verdict had said the pellets recovered from the Chinkaras were not fired from Khan’s licensed gun. Khan was jailed in 2007 for nearly a week for shooting an endangered Chinkara (gazelle).

While arguing the case in the court, Khan’s lawyer had contended that the actor had been falsely framed in these cases, merely on the statements of Dulani.

The lawyer argued that Dulani was never available to them for cross-examination and hence his statements could not be relied upon in the conviction of Khan.

He had also contended that both the cases have been built on circumstantial evidences and there was no eye-witness or any material evidence against Salman.

  1. No Comments.

Go to Top