1. BMC election results 2017: Why did BJP Win in Maharashtra and other parties lose?

BMC election results 2017: Why did BJP Win in Maharashtra and other parties lose?

With this election, Fadnavis, who does not have the advantage of political lineage or the backing of a numerically influential caste, has emerged as a pan-Maharashtrian leader.

By: | Updated: February 24, 2017 12:40 PM
Another reason for the success of BJP iacross Maharashtra is the failure of the Congress to emerge as a viable political alternative. (PTI)

The BJP has emerged a clear winner in Maharashtra civic elections. That made it the single largest party in eight of the 10 municipal corporations in the state. Even in Congress and NCP strongholds like Pune, Pimpri-Chinchwad, it has become a winner. But it has come a close second to Shiv Sena in the riches civic body in the country. The BJP owes its success in large measure to the leadership of Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, who spearheaded the campaign in the state. With this election, Fadnavis, who does not have the advantage of political lineage or the backing of a numerically influential caste, has emerged as a pan-Maharashtrian leader. Another reason for the success of BJP iacross Maharashtra is the failure of the Congress to emerge as a viable political alternative.

If congress wants to it stay relevant in Maharashtra and elsewhere, the Congress will need an imaginative political strategy and narrative. The reliance on a  moribund model of patronage politics has cost the party its organisational base, but despite successive defeats, the party doesn’t seem to realise that the ground is slipping beneath its feet

The decline of the Congress in urban Maharashtra is complete with the party failing to win a single corporation and finishing third in most urban civic bodies. The NCP’s fate is no better since it has lost Pune and Pimpri-Chinchwad, two municipal corporations which form the core of its political base. The Sena managed to stay ahead of the BJP in Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), which it ruled for over two decades, and retained Thane, but evidence suggests that it has lost ground to the BJP.

In fact, the Sena, a partner of the BJP in the central and state governments as well as the BMC, has been the most vocal opposition in Maharashtra. The two parties parted ways bitterly before the civic elections, but the opposition failed to capitalise on the public spat between the long-standing allies. While the Sena tried to reinvent itself by moderating its nativist agenda and showcasing its achievements in administration, the Congress remained listless. Inner-party squabbles, the absence of dynamic leaders and a crumbling organisation have all contributed to the decline of the Congress in Maharashtra, a state that had been a stronghold at the worst of times for the party. That the grand old party lags behind the BJP, Sena and the NCP in terms of totalnumber of corporators in the state illustrates the magnitude of Congress decline.

If it wants to stay relevant in Maharashtra and elsewhere, the Congress will need an imaginative political strategy and narrative. The reliance on a moribund model of patronage politics has cost the party its organisational base, but despite successive defeats, the party doesn’t seem to realise that the ground is slipping beneath its feet.

Get latest news and updates on Auto Expo 2018, check breaking news on Budget 2018, like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

  1. S
    saikumar
    Feb 24, 2017 at 6:57 am
    Sena lost because of adamant behaviour of due raut-Uddhav. Sena workers r angry with this duo. Uddhav insulted BJP offering just 60!seats though BJP strength demand 114 seats BJP agreed to scale down to 105 and Sena would get 122 and as a results BJP-Sena would have swept BMC with >200 seats. A split in Sena is imminent because many could not become corporators b'cos of UDhav and son.
    Reply

    Go to Top