1. Bengal opposes GST rates, Amit Mitra may attend June 3 meeting

Bengal opposes GST rates, Amit Mitra may attend June 3 meeting

West Bengal Finance Minister Amit Mitra today opposed GST rates on some products that were likely to impact the state economy and employment badly.

By: | Kolkata | Published: May 30, 2017 11:33 PM
GST rates, GST, West Bengal, Amit Mitra,  Finance Minister Amit Mitra, state economy, bengal economy, Parliamentary Affairs Amit Mitra said when he was the chairman of the empowered committee of the state finance ministers they were able to mend the Centre’s diktats. (Reuters)

West Bengal Finance Minister Amit Mitra today opposed GST rates on some products that were likely to impact the state economy and employment badly. “We have to continue our fight for our demands to bring down the tax rates on some products which will adversely impact the state economy and employment”, Mitra said here. The minister said that he might attend the next council meeting on June 3 to raise their concerns, if he was in good health. “I may attend the meeting if my health permits,” Mitra said. He did not attend the last GST council meeting.

The meeting is slated to take up tax rates for goods like gold which were left out in the last meeting. He said the state government opposed tax rates on cinema, books and leather among others. Mitra said when he was the chairman of the empowered committee of the state finance ministers they were able to mend the Centre’s diktats.

You may also like to watch:

“But now with the GST council in place, we remain as just one vote in the 33-member council,” he said.
Mitra also raised doubts about the readiness for July 1 for GST roll out. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Partha Chatterjee said the party would continue to fight against the unilateral decisions taken by the Centre on rates till an amicable solution was reached.

There was no decision on ratifying the law in the state assembly, he said. Both the ministers said that the state had supported GST in principle, but now the Centre was acting unilaterally and was not in the interest of the state.

  1. No Comments.

Go to Top