1. Budget’s provident fund tax move could lead to large outflow from EPFO corpus

Budget’s provident fund tax move could lead to large outflow from EPFO corpus

The labour ministry fears that there can be a large outflow from the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation’s (EPFO) corpus of Rs 6.2 lakh crore before the proposed tax on withdrawals kicks in from April this year.

By: and | New Delhi | Updated: March 2, 2016 10:48 AM
Union Budget - EPFO tax Budget provident fund tax move: The labour ministry, which had been kept in the dark over the imposition of taxes on provident fund (PF) withdrawals or the interest accrued, fears that there can be a large outflow from the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation’s (EPFO) corpus of Rs 6.2 lakh crore before the proposed tax on withdrawals kicks in from April this year. (Photo: PTI)

The labour ministry, which had been kept in the dark over the imposition of taxes on provident fund (PF) withdrawals or the interest accrued, fears that there can be a large outflow from the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation’s (EPFO) corpus of Rs 6.2 lakh crore before the proposed tax on withdrawals kicks in from April this year.

The EPFO, which falls under the jurisdiction of the labour ministry, came into being in 1952 under the jurisdiction of the labour ministry. The interest rate it pays every year to its subscribers is, however, decided by the finance ministry, even as the retirement fund body pays it from its income on investments.

Sources in the labour ministry said it was never consulted on the tax issue before it was announced in the Budget. Clearly aggrieved, they said much was not going to come to the government exchequer if only the interest part is taxed. The Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) is a large source of cheaper funds for the government.

“A back-of-the-envelope calculation would suggest that the loss of interest income because of the fund outflow, and the interest income by way of taxing 60% of the interest income on withdrawals, could be significant,” a senior official said.

If the motive was to tax the Employees’ Pension Scheme (EPS) to bring it in parity with the National Pension System (NPS), there would not have been much furore, but taxing any component of the provident fund was bound to attract the wrath of retired people, who often use the fund for various obligatory purposes, like one’s daughter’s marriage or buying a home.

“The finance ministry has stirred a hornets’ nest with the proposal. A widespread protest is awaited and we are also bearing the consequences,” said a trade union leader.

However, the government would not require to amend the PFO Act to bring the proposals into effect, it would require to amend the Income Tax Act.

  1. M
    Mahendra
    Mar 2, 2016 at 5:48 am
    This will be the single biggest reason for the unmaking of BJP and its vote base, if they insist on taxing EPF, the only retirement corpus for most of the ried employees. The support of huge proportion of so called BJP's bhakts, i.e. Urban educated middle cl who aspires to see India grow and also grow along with will vanish overnight. If achhey din means broad daylight robbery of retirement emergency fund then burey din (bad days) is preferred anytime over this.
    Reply

    Go to Top