We have carefully gone through the review petition and the connected papers. We find no merit in the review petition and the same is accordingly dismissed, a bench of Chief Justice P Sathasivam and justices Ranjan Gogoi and SK Singh said.
The Centre had contended in its petition that the three-judge bench did not consider the merits of the case and also ventured into the domain of the government by commuting the death sentence in the case.
It had further contended that the February 18 judgment was passed without jurisdiction by the three-judge bench instead of by a larger bench of five judges, as the case involved substantial interpretation of law and provisions of the Constitution.
It is respectfully submitted that the impugned judgment is patently illegal, suffers from errors apparent on the face of the record and flies in the face of well-established principles of law laid down by this Court and contained in the Constitution and other statutes, the petition had said.
It is submitted that in the present case, the issue raised was that of the commutation of the death sentence to life imprisonment on the ground of delay, which allegedly attracted Article 21 in favour of the convicts. Therefore, it involved a substantial issue of interpretation of the Constitution and ought to have been heard by a bench of five judges, as mandated by the Constitution, the petition had said.
The apex court had on February 18 commuted the death sentence of Santhan, Murugan and Perarivalan to imprisonment for life on the ground of delay in deciding their mercy plea by the Centre.