But for all the alarm raised by banksSBI chairman Pratip Chaudhuri has said a repo hike would have been preferable to the liquidity squeezeit is not clear all banks will be squeezed for liquidity, except for those with a relatively low CASA. For one, banks are collectively holding more gilts than they are required to; a couple of the bigger banks are sitting on 2-3 percentage points more than the mandated 23% of deposits. For another, the increase in non-food credit has stayed under 15% year-on-year, for the last eight fortnights. While its true that deposits are growing at barely 14% year-on-year, thats coming off a higher base. Should the demand for money pick up, as we approach busy seasonunlikely, given the current trends in manufacturingand should the central bank persist with the tight money policy, its possible banks might fall short of liquidity. And, given the competition in the marketplace, it would be difficult for them to increase loan rates significantly. But, given that banks havent really responded to the RBIs signals when it effected rate cuts a few months backmost of them opted to cut rates for specific products instead of a base rate cut which would have lowered borrowing costs across customersthey should refrain from increasing rates even if means a contraction in their net interest margins. As their owner, the government needs to persuade banks to leave loan rates unchanged, if only for their own goodsmaller borrowers are already in big trouble, a rate hike will only add to restructured loans and non-performing assets. The RBI Governor has said on several occasions that banks need to sacrifice margins, pointing out that banks in India enjoy better margins than their counterparts in peer markets. It is time the government reinforced this message.