"Upon consent of the parties, the Court hereby orders the defendant to surrender for service of his sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau of Prisons not later than 2:00 p.m. on June 17, 2014," US District Judge Jed Rakoff said in his order.
On March 25, a US court upheld the 2012 conviction of 65-year-old Rajat Gupta on insider trading charges for supplying confidential information to jailed hedge fund boss Raj Rajaratnam.
The Harvard-educated Rajat Gupta had suffered a major setback a district denied his bid for a new trial, ruling that there was no merit in Gupta's appeal.
Rajat Gupta was found guilty in June 2012 of passing confidential information about Goldman Sachs to his friend and business associate Rajaratnam just minutes after Gupta exited Goldman's board meetings.
Rajat Gupta was sentenced to two years' imprisonment, to be followed by a one-year term of supervised release, and was ordered to pay a fine of USD 5,000,000. He had been free on bail pending decision on his appeal.
"We conclude that Gupta's contentions lack merit, and we affirm the judgement," the order said.
The prosecution had presented as evidence telephone records that showed that calls were made to Rajaratnam's direct line from the conference room telephones where Rajat Gupta had participated in Goldman Sachs board meeting.
The connection between Rajaratnam's line and the telephone Gupta used lasted approximately 30 to 35 seconds.
Rajat Gupta had challenged his conviction, contending that he is entitled to a new trial on the grounds that the trial court erred by admitting statements of a co-conspirator, recorded in wiretapped telephone conversations to which Gupta was not a party, and by excluding relevant evidence offered by Gupta.
The appeals court said it "disagrees" with Gupta's arguement that the trial court was wrong in allowing at his trial an October 24, 2008 wiretapped conversation between Rajaratnam and David Lau, a Singapore-based portfolio manager at Galleon and a September 24 conversation with his trader Ian Horowitz.
In the October call, Rajaratnam told Lau that he "heard yesterday from somebody who is on the board of Goldman Sachs, that they are going to lose two dollars per share." Gupta's lawyers said there was no evidence that Lau had ever traded in Goldman stock. They also say that Gupta was never a participant in these calls.
"On appeal, Gupta argues principally that Rajaratnam's wiretapped conversations with Horowitz and Lau were inadmissible hearsay; that the trial court erred in curtailing evidence proffered by Gupta in his defence; and that the errors, either singly or in combination, entitle him to a new trial....We disagree," the appeals court had ruled.