Perhaps it is now time to follow a different approach, on even what are considered to be routine tax matters, the kind followed by the government while introducing the GST, for instance, or even in the manner in which GAAR and retrospective taxation was to be dealt withopen up the process to public scrutiny and get as much public opinion as possible on the matter. In the case of extending the securities transaction tax (STT) to commodities, for instance, many have pointed out that the imposition of STT on the shares itself has resulted in exporting overseas a large part of the Indian marketa commodity tax will do the same for commodity markets. And if the transaction tax is to be extended to commodities, it is a matter of time before it is extended to currency markets or bond markets. Similarly, if foreign investors feel they are being victimised by the taxman, the implications of this are certain to be serious. Why not appoint a committee of tax experts, under FM advisor Parthasarathi Shome for instance, to examine the impact of such new taxesor new/novel interpretations by the taxmanand have a public consultation process Indeed, as is the case in some jurisdictions such as the UK, while formulating new tax proposals, it should be mandatory for the taxman to come up with some sort of an impact assessment as well. Slapping tax demands is all very well, but the track-record of actually collecting theseafter these demands are contested at the tribunal and various courtshas to be an integral part of the exercise, apart from analysing the likely economic impact of the proposal. As someone who worked for the UK taxman, thats something Dr Shome must be familiar with.