Some of the fault does lie with the international body. Its other main opposition to the adoption of the Sports Code rules is that it allows tainted people like Lalit Bhanot, appointed as secretary general of IOA while facing graft charges relating to the Commonwealth Games, to come to power. While this is an important issue, it should ideally be dealt with separately from the adoption of the Sports Code. In an ideal scenario, people facing criminal charges shouldnt be allowed to stand for any governmental position, but thats a separate discussion. The Sports Code does have some rules that need to be implementedsuch as the capping of the number of tenures heads of sports bodies can have, stipulating their retirement ages, etc. These are to keep sports bodies from becoming the private fiefdoms of a few. Keeping tainted people out of the leadership of the IOA should not come at the expense of rules that can genuinely improve sports in India; it should come along with them. And, for its part, the IOA should make sure it maintains international standards in its election processmainly, keeping tainted officials out. In all of this, its Indias athletes who stand to lose.