A McKinsey study analyses the progress of countries like Brazil, Thailand and South Korea who had health parameters as bad as Indias a few decades ago but are dramatically better today. What worked there By and large, these countries dispensed with the states role as a provider during the 1970s and, instead, incentivised the private sector to step up provision, while heavily assisting low-income groups through social insurance and other subsidies. A study by some World Bank economists for rural Madhya Pradesh and urban Delhi showed dramatically higher quality health coverage by the private sector.
While this may solve the problem of availability, the question of affordability is quite another. There is little doubt excessive reliance on insurance-based models jack up costsweve seen several examples of this in the governments RSBY programmeand more so if solutions to better health lie in better primary care, where the private sector hardly ventures. But even if the government was to go by the McKinsey solution as opposed to the Srinath Reddy one of greater government-funded primary healthcare, whats required is a totally different type of government. Government-funded and privately-provided models are being tried in highways and also in schooling, so theres no reason why they shouldnt be tried in healthcare. But this needs tight contracting of the sort were just about beginning to see in Indiain the past, hospitals have got free land in return for a promise to treat the poor free, but this has been honoured more in the breach. Thats a prescription for disaster.