As of Tuesday, there were about 780,000 comments, far more than for any previous rule-making proceeding before the Federal Communications Commission.
The agency is fine-tuning its rules to secure an open Internet, after a federal-court decision in January said it had to rethink its approach.
After the court ruling, Tom Wheeler, chairman of the FCC, proposed a path in step with the court ruling that would explicitly allow commercially reasonable deals. Such deals are typically for faster streaming of internet content between broadband operators phone and cable companies like Verizon, AT&T and Comcast and online media distributors like Netflix and Googles YouTube.
Wheelers plan, according to its many critics, would open the door to a two-tier internet of fast and slow lanes, with affluent companies and households enjoying premium service and everyone else fighting traffic: A death knell for the open internet and its democratic ethos of net neutrality.
Kevin Werbach, a former FCC counsel and an associate professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, said, The way this has been framed for a lot of people is that the FCC is trying to change the internet as we know it.
Wheeler, who has been a lobbyist for the cable and telecommunications industries, has said that will not be the case, and that the agency will set a high bar for commercially reasonable arrangements. He has also said he is open to other ways to both accommodate the court ruling and maintain an open internet, and the FCC has welcomed public comments.
The deadline for the first round of comments was Tuesday, but has been extended to Friday. A second period for so-called reply comments will run until September 10.
Despite the flood of comments, the open internet debate has a way to go before it matches the public reaction the agency absorbed after a televised glimpse of Janet Jacksons nipple during the Super Bowl halftime show in 2004, a wardrobe malfunction seen around the world. That incident elicited 1.4 million messages from the public, but the FCC classifies those as complaints rather than comments.
A sampling of the many thousands of individual comments posted on the commissions website is heavily weighted toward urging the FCC to take strong action to preserve net neutrality and criticising Wheelers proposal as not doing that.
Net neutrality is crucial to fair competition and free speech, Maya Cook wrote, and this proposal is a disaster in the making.