Column: Why the debt ceiling matters

Written by New York Times | Updated: Oct 9 2013, 09:32am hrs
What would happen if Congress lets the United States government default

The word we keep hearing is


A US Default Seen as Catastrophe, Dwarfing Lehmans Fall, screams the headline in Bloomberg Businessweek. A default would be unprecedented and has the potential to be catastrophic, says a Treasury Department report issued on Thursdaytwo weeks before the government is expected to begin running out of cash.

But what does catastrophic actually mean in this context In the summer of 2011, when Republicans refused to raise the debt ceiling unless President Obama caved to their extortionist demands, the same word was bandied about. It scared the political class enough that they kicked the can and avoided a default.

This time around, the need to raise the debt ceiling doesnt seem to be generating nearly the same concern. Indeed, Tea Party Republicans seem to be almost rooting for the government to default, as if that would somehow bring about the smaller government they so yearn for.

But this is incredibly wrongheaded. A failure to raise the debt ceiling, should it come to that, would likely inflict a different kind of pain than sequestration or even a shutdown of the federal government. It wont make the government smaller. But it does have the potential to diminish the value of one of Americas greatest assetsthe backing of its debtwhile throwing the world economy into chaos.

The first point worth making is that the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which declares that the validity of the public debt of the United States shall not be questioned, was added precisely to avoid what is happening now: a faction of Congress using the debt ceiling as a bargaining chip. That basic truth, as Fortunes Roger Parloff noted in a recent blog

post, ought to weigh very heavily in the minds

and on the consciencesof the House Republican faction that is now unambiguously violating its letter and spirit.

The second point worth making is that US government debt is the only risk-free asset in the world. That debt undergirds the entire world financial systemprecisely because the whole world has such faith in it. There is always demand for US government debt. Almost every other asset you can think of is in some way measured against it. A default would destabilise the market for Treasuries. And that, in turn, would likely destabilise every other asset.

The stock market would fall.

Interest rates would risemeaning, for instance, mortgages would become more expensive just as the housing

market is starting to revive. Treasuries themselves would likely have

to pay higher interest to

investors, which would

create a rather sad irony:

a default would exacerbate the countrys long-

term debt (the very problem the Republicans claim to care about).

Lets move to the havoc a destabilised Treasury debt would have on the banking system. The plumbing of the global financial system depends on Treasuries, says Karen Petrou, a banking expert at Federal Financial Analytics. Remember what happened to Lehman Brothers As the market lost faith in the companys ability to meet its obligations, Lehman lost access to the repo market, which is the way banks are funded on a short-term basis. Treasuries make up a great deal of the collateral in the repo market. If a default were to cause the repo market to freeze, the entire banking system would find itself in crisis. Meanwhilemore shades of Lehman Brothersthe ratings agencies would likely downgrade Treasuries, forcing money market funds to start dumping government debt.

Painful choices would have to be made. Right now, the Treasury Department says it does not have the authority to pick and choose which creditors to pay. But, in the event of a default, it is hard to imagine that the government wouldnt make some tough decisions about who should get paid in the short termand who would have to wait. And, though this would infuriate millions of Americans, bondholders in China would likely get their money ahead of, say, Social Security recipients.

From a purely cost-benefit analysis, says Mark Zandi of Moodys Analytics, not paying bondholders would wind up costing the US much more than not paying Social Security recipientsbecause if bondholders lost faith in Treasuries, it would cost the government billions more in interest payments each year.

During the 2011 debt-ceiling crisis, consumer confidence dropped by 22%. When consumer confidence falls, people are less willing to spend and businesses are less willing to hire. Thats how recessionsor depressionsbegin, and that may be the most important consequence of all.

For as long as anyone can remember, the ability of the United States government to pay its bills on time has given the rest of world tremendous confidence. At the same time, to have the one asset everyone in the world trusts has given America great advantages.

Why on earth would we ever risk that Why