The states had pegged their unmet CST revenue losses until FY13 end at Rs 34,000 crore.
The idea is to build consensus quickly on contentious issues through a process of give-and-take so that a Bill to amend the Constitution to facilitate a new tax regime could be tabled in the Lok Sabha in the winter session of Parliament, sources told FE.
The Centres move is despite some states continuing to be ambivalent towards GST for fear of loss of their fiscal autonomy. While the BJP-ruled states were among those that were chary of GST under the UPA regime, Madhya Pradesh, which is under BJP control, has lately written to the Centre expressing concerns over the need to give concurrent taxation powers to the Centre and states for introduction of the GST regime.
According to sources, in return for releasing compensation and for a constitutional mechanism to deal with GST losses of states, the central government expects state finance ministers to drop their demand for keeping petroleum and alcohol out of GST through a provision in the Constitution itself. Sushil Kumar Modi, former chairman of the empowered committee of state finance ministers, told FE that petroleum products should not be constitutionally barred from GST. He added that the GST Council proposed in the Constitutional Amendment Bill could decide when to subsume petroleum products in GST.
The Centre is willing to keep GST rate on these items at zero initially, but is against excluding them constitutionally, which will make it difficult to bring them under the ambit of GST in the future.
Only a small part of the R9,300 crore approved by Parliament in the Union Budget for FY14 as CST compensation was released to states. For extra funds, the finance ministry can seek supplementary demands for grants in any of the coming Parliament sessions.
States insist on a financial guarantee under the Constitution for compensating GST losses saying their experience of getting compensation for losses on account of replacing sales tax with value-added tax was miserable.
We can certainly introduce the Constitution (115th Amendment) Bill in the winter session, after which it will have to be referred to a new parliamentary standing committee, which would be set up in the next few days, said a person familiar with the discussions in the government.
An earlier version of the Bill that was reviewed by the previous standing committee led by the BJPs Yashwant Sinha had lapsed at the end of the UPA governments term. The Sinha panel had taken about three years to give its report on the earlier Bill, which indicates that it might take at least a couple of years for the next panel to give the final version of the Bill. Sources also said the central government will need the support of the Congress in the Rajya Sabha to get the Bill passed.