The Mylan deal is the third-largest in the Indian pharma space after Daiichi Sankyos $4.6-billion acquisition of Ranbaxy Labs in 2008 and Abbotts $3.7-billion takeover of Piramal Healthcare in 2010.
The foreign investment promotion board (FIPB) had given the deal its green signal at its August 27 meeting on the back of Prime minister Manmohan Singh directing ministries to clear all pending brownfield pharma FDI proposals.
The February 2013 bid had been kept "in abeyance" by FIPB, earlier, due to objections raised by the department of industrial policy and promotion. DIPP's view was that if foreign firms are allowed to buyout existing Indian units, specially the ones making specialised life-saving drugs, it would lead to lower production and increased pricing of these essential medicines, vaccines and injectibles.
Onco Therapies, a subsidiary of Agila (Strides injectables arm), specialises in cancer drugs in both injectables and solid formulations. DIPP, in its earlier dissent note to finance and health ministries, asked for the need to protect rare oncology facilities to service the country's interest in the form of assured supply of life-saving drugs at affordable prices.
However, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) had also cleared the Mylan-Strides deal in June this year after noting that it wont have any appreciable adverse impact on competition in India since both firms have insignificant presence in the relevant Indian market.
India allows 100% FDI for greenfield pharma projects through the automatic route whereas in existing pharma businesses, while 100% FDI is allowed, the proposals have to be routed through the FIPB.
In the case of brownfield FDI, the government can impose three riders on the foreign firms acquiring domestic pharma firms. Firstly, the acquirer will have to maintain the quantitative level of essential medicines produced at the time of induction of foreign investment into the domestic unit for a period of five years. The level is defined as the highest annual production level of the medicines in any of the three years preceding the induction of foreign investment.
Secondly, the highest of the annual expenses incurred by the Indian company on R&D in the preceding three years have to be maintained for the five years following the induction of FDI.
Thirdly, the foreign company will also have to provide complete information on technology transfer to the FIPB.